dc.contributor.author |
Königs, Peter |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-02-11T12:29:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-02-11T12:29:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1465-394X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/97892 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Routledge Journals |
de_DE |
dc.relation.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1426100 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
150 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
300 |
de_DE |
dc.title |
Two types of debunking arguments |
de_DE |
dc.type |
Article |
de_DE |
utue.quellen.id |
20190321153956_04393 |
|
utue.publikation.seiten |
383-402 |
de_DE |
utue.personen.roh |
Koenigs, Peter |
|
dcterms.isPartOf.ZSTitelID |
Philosophical Psychology |
de_DE |
dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Issue |
3 |
de_DE |
dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Volume |
31 |
de_DE |
utue.fakultaet |
05 Philosophische Fakultät |
de_DE |