dc.contributor.author |
Burman, Michele |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kelly, Liz |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lovett, Jo |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-03-28T13:06:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-03-28T13:06:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
1678031526 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/87323 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-873239 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-28709 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This report looks at attrition in Scotland. Attrition – the process by which the majority of reported rape cases fail to reach trial – has become a critical research and policy issue. In virtually all countries where major studies have been published, substantial increases in reporting have not been matched by rises in prosecutions, resulting in a falling conviction rate. Whilst this pattern has been documented in two previous Daphne projects (Regan & Kelly, 2003), it was not universal across Europe. This report forms part of a wider project funded by the EU Commission which is analysing the similarities and differences in attrition processes across 11 countries with varying judicial systems and socio-legal cultures; it is the first study to do this. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
dc.subject.classification |
Vergewaltigung , Verurteilung , Schottland |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
360 |
de_DE |
dc.title |
Scotland Country Report. Different Systems, Similar Outcomes? Tracking Attrition in Reported Rape Cases in 11 European Countries |
en |
dc.type |
Report |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Kriminologie |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
Kriminologisches Repository |
de_DE |
utue.opus.portal |
kdoku |
de_DE |