Export regulation, import safety? EU public and private motivations to influence China’s food safety regulation

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Abels, Gabriele (Prof. Dr.)
dc.contributor.author Kottenstede, Kai Daniel
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-09T10:53:54Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-09T10:53:54Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-09
dc.identifier.other 507423232 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10900/83009
dc.identifier.uri http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-830093 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-24400
dc.description.abstract The globalization of food production has increased the probability for markets to import unsafe food. Against this backdrop, in December 2001 China joined the World Trade Organisation (WTO). With this step the country effectively became part of the globalized food production. This study analyses how the European Union (EU) – understood as an entity comprising public as well as private actors – responded to this challenge. More specifically, the objective is to understand the motivation behind the EU’s observed activities to influence China’s food safety regulation. Two hypotheses are deduced from theories of regulatory interdependence. The first assumes a supply safety hypothesis. With its massive food safety problems, China quickly posed risks to global food safety and thus also to EU’s food safety. This happened at a time, when the EU itself had reinforced its food safety regulation with a stronger focus on consumer interests. Any influence by EU actors on China’s food safety regulation thus could be the result of heightened import safety concerns. The second hypothesis offers an alternative explanation. China presents an attractive export market for EU companies. Although lagging behind the internationally established benchmark for safety, China’s food safety regulation still potentially created market entry barriers for EU food exports. Activities to influence China’s food safety regulation hence could be based on the interest to reduce such regulatory barriers to trade. Based on a mechanistic understanding of causality and the method of process tracing, this study specifies which combination of both motivations explains the observed activities by EU actors to influence China’s food safety regulation between 2001 and 2014. en
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Universität Tübingen de_DE
dc.rights ubt-podok de_DE
dc.rights.uri http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de de_DE
dc.rights.uri http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en en
dc.subject.classification Politische Wissenschaft , Politische Steuerung , Regulierung , China , Europäische Union , Lebensmittelsicherheit , Risiko , Internationale Politik , Politiktransfer , Welthandel , Handelspolitik , Internationale Norm , Globalisierung , Transnationale Politik , Nichtstaatliche Organisation , Risikogesellschaft , Lebensmittel , Ernährung de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 300 de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 320 de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 330 de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 380 de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 630 de_DE
dc.subject.other Interdependencies en
dc.subject.other International Regulation en
dc.subject.other Regulatory Politics en
dc.subject.other Regulatory Regimes en
dc.subject.other Food Safety en
dc.subject.other European Union en
dc.title Export regulation, import safety? EU public and private motivations to influence China’s food safety regulation en
dc.type Dissertation de_DE
dcterms.dateAccepted 2017-12-11
utue.publikation.fachbereich Politikwissenschaft de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet 6 Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät de_DE

Dateien:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record