The Solidarisation of International Society: The EU in the Global Climate Change Regime

DSpace Repository


Dateien:

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10900/78372
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-783728
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-19770
Dokumentart: Article
Date: 2017-11
Source: GLOBUS Research Paper 5/2017 available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=3059873
Language: English
Faculty: 6 Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Department: Politikwissenschaft
DDC Classifikation: 320 - Political science
Keywords: Europäische Union , Klimaänderung , Ambiguität , Wandel
Other Keywords:
European Union
Climate Change
Ambiguity
Normative Power
Change as Solidarisation
International Society
ISBN: 2535-2504
License: http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en
Order a printed copy: Print-on-Demand
Show full item record

Abstract:

The European Union more often than not is either assumed or expected to play a leading role in international politics of climate change. This expectation emanates largely from the assumption that the EU as a normative power is able to induce change in international society. This paper intends to explore this assumed transformative potential of the EU in the specific context of climate politics. Suggesting an English School approach, in this paper I conceptualise the EU’s potential transformative impact as the solidarisation of international society. The advantage of such an analytical perspective is that it directs the focus on tensions and ambiguities that always and unavoidably exist in processes of change. In the paper, I first elaborate on the conceptualisation of change as solidarisation. Second, I spell out in detail what such a solidarisation means in international climate politics. Third, an empirical analysis of the EU’s discourse and practices in climate politics reveals whether the EU indeed acts as a source of solidarisation in this particular policy field. In contrast to the widespread assumption that consistency is key to change, this paper suggests that accepting and embracing ambiguities indeed enhances the EU’s contribution to solidarisation.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)