dc.contributor.advisor |
Kirschniak, Andreas (PD Dr.) |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hein, Dirk Phillip |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-05-30T07:08:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-05-30T07:08:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-05-30 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
489098487 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/76485 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-764851 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-17887 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND:
Hyperbilirubinaemia is reported to be a positive predictor in diagnosing appendicitis and especially appendiceal perforation. We, therefore, analysed the diagnostic accuracy of serum bilirubin in anticipating appendicitis and its severity.
METHODS:
All consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected appendicitis from May 2009 to August 2011 were analysed. Patients were classified based on final histopathological findings into the groups: no appendiceal inflammation, non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of serum bilirubin levels in discriminating between no appendiceal inflammation and any appendicitis (perforated and non-perforated appendicitis) and non-perforated and perforated appendicitis.
RESULTS:
Of 493 analysed patients, 125 (25%) had no appendiceal inflammation, 312 (64%) had non-perforated appendicitis and 56 (11%) had perforated appendicitis. The proportion of patients with bilirubin elevation (>1.1 mg/dL) was different between those with no appendiceal inflammation (14%) and any appendicitis (36%) (p<0.0001), and between non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis 48% (p=0.04). However, the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for an elevated bilirubin were poor at discriminating the groups: no appendiceal inflammation versus any appendicitis (LR+ 2.62 (95% CI 1.65 to 4.16) and LR- 0.75 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.83)) and non-perforated appendicitis versus perforated appendicitis (LR+ estimate 1.74 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.38) and LR- 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.93)).
CONCLUSIONS:
Hyperbilirubinaemia is present in acute appendicitis but has a low diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between any appendicitis versus no appendiceal inflammation and perforated versus non-perforated appendicitis and is, therefore, of limited value in clinical routine. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
de |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
dc.rights |
ubt-podok |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Blinddarmentzündung , Hyperbilirubinämie , Akutes Abdomen |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
610 |
de_DE |
dc.title |
Bilirubin als diagnostischer Marker der akuten perforierten Appendizitis |
de_DE |
dc.type |
PhDThesis |
de_DE |
dcterms.dateAccepted |
2017-03-30 |
|
utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Medizin |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
4 Medizinische Fakultät |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.source |
Emerg Med J. 2015 Sep;32(9):698-702. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203349. Epub 2014 Dec 4. |
de_DE |