Argument Omission between Valency and Construction

DSpace Repository


Dateien:

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10900/67218
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-672180
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-8638
Dokumentart: InProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.)
Date: 2015-11-04
Language: English
Faculty: 5 Philosophische Fakultät
5 Philosophische Fakultät
Department: Allgemeine u. vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft
DDC Classifikation: 400 - Language and Linguistics
Keywords: Linguistik
License: Publishing license including print on demand
Order a printed copy: Print-on-Demand
Show full item record

Abstract:

Our paper deals with the omission of direct arguments in non-elliptical contexts. We argue that valency requirements do not suffice to explain argument omission and that sentence type also plays a crucial role. Our argumentation is based on a set of acceptability rating studies. We conclude with a proposal how our results could be modeled in the grammar.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)