Abstract:
Despite considerable evidence that certain life-course transitions can play a
significant role in helping some offenders abandon crime, several fundamental issues
remain unresolved. In this dissertation, I examine the links between crime and two lifecourse
transitions related to the development of families in adulthood: cohabitation and
marriage. Using data from the National Youth Survey (NYS), I investigate the extent to
which both types of relationships can contribute to desistance. I then evaluate the major
theoretical mechanisms through which marriage is most likely to promote behavioral
change. Finally, I examine the degree to which these relationships foster desistance for
both men and women. Results indicate that marriage has the capacity to promote
desistance, whereas cohabitation does not, and that the effects of marriage on crime are
conditional on both the social orientation of the spouse and the quality of the marital
relationship. These and other results are mostly consistent with social control and social
learning theories of crime and desistance. In addition, the results of the analyses indicate
that the effects of marriage on crime are similar among men and women.