The Effectiveness of Incarceration-Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior: A Systematic Review

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor The Campbell Collaboration
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, Ojmarrh
dc.contributor.author Wilson, David B.
dc.contributor.author MacKenzie, Doris L.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-07T13:45:47Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-07T13:45:47Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11
dc.identifier.other 480615020 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10900/64685
dc.identifier.uri http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-646850 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-6107
dc.description.abstract Many, if not most, incarcerated offenders have substance abuse problems. Without effective treatment, these substance-abusing offenders are likely to persist in non-drug offending. The period of incarceration offers an opportunity to intervene in the cycle of drug abuse and crime. Although many types of incarceration-based drug treatment programs are available (e.g., therapeutic communities and group counseling), the effectiveness of these programs is unclear. The objective of this research synthesis is to systematically review quasi-experimental and experimental (RCT) evaluations of the effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment programs in reducing post-release recidivism and drug relapse. A secondary objective of this synthesis is to examine variation in effectiveness by programmatic, sample, and methodological features. In this update of the original 2006 review (see Mitchell, Wilson, and MacKenzie, 2006), studies made available since the original review were included in an effort to keep current with emerging research. This synthesis of evaluations of incarceration-based drug treatment programs found that such programs are modestly effective in reducing recidivism. These findings most strongly support the effectiveness of therapeutic communities, as these programs produced relatively consistent reductions in recidivism and drug use. Both counseling and incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs had mixed effects. Counseling programs were associated with reductions in recidivism but not drug use; whereas, incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs were associated with reductions in drug use but not recidivism. Note that our findings regarding the effectiveness of incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs differ from a larger review of community-based narcotic maintenance programs (see Egli, Pina, Christensen, Aebi, and Killias, 2009). Finally, boot camp programs for drug offenders had negligible effects on both recidivism and drug use. en
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Universität Tübingen de_DE
dc.subject.classification Haft , Drogenabhängigkeit , Drogentherapie de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 360 de_DE
dc.subject.other Incarceration en
dc.subject.other Drug-Treatment en
dc.subject.other Review en
dc.title The Effectiveness of Incarceration-Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior: A Systematic Review en
dc.type Aufsatz de_DE
utue.publikation.fachbereich Kriminologie de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet Kriminologisches Repository de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet Kriminologisches Repository de_DE
utue.opus.portal kdoku de_DE
utue.publikation.source Systematic Reviews, 18, 2012 de_DE

Dateien:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record