Benefit-cost analyses of sentencing

DSpace Repositorium (Manakin basiert)

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor The Campbell Collaboration
dc.contributor.author McDougall, Cynthia
dc.contributor.author Cohen, Mark A.
dc.contributor.author Swaray, Raymond
dc.contributor.author Perry, Amanda
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-03T15:29:51Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-03T15:29:51Z
dc.date.issued 2008-03
dc.identifier.other 480122830 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10900/64641
dc.identifier.uri http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-646419 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-6063
dc.description.abstract Sentencing policies are most frequently designed by policy-makers and implemented by the courts with the aim of punishing, deterring and rehabilitating offenders in order to reduce future re-offending. However many sentencing decisions are made without knowledge of the effectiveness of sentences in achieving their objectives, or the costs and benefits of the different sentencing alternatives. The following systematic review was conducted in order to address these questions and to review the existing evidence on the costs and benefits of different sentencing options. Results from costeffectiveness studies were retained to provide supporting information. The objective of the review was to identify and assess the quality of studies of the costs and benefits of different sentencing options. en
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Universität Tübingen de_DE
dc.subject.classification Strafzumessung de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 360 de_DE
dc.subject.other sentencing en
dc.subject.other benefit-cost analyses en
dc.title Benefit-cost analyses of sentencing en
dc.type Article de_DE
utue.publikation.fachbereich Kriminologie de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet Kriminologisches Repository de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet Kriminologisches Repository de_DE
utue.opus.portal kdoku de_DE
utue.publikation.source Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10, 2008 de_DE

Dateien:

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige