Abstract:
The study proceeds from new concepts of organizational development as organizational learning and investigates the Benedictine rules with the application of the hermeneutic method. The Benedictine rule originated in the 6th century and is the spiritual basis of the Benedictine order. It has directed the life of the Benedictine and other monastic communities up until the present day. Within the scope of this investigation it will be clarified which indications for the shaping and changing of organizations are contained in the rules and which of those can be applied to the present day challenges of development orientated management.
In the first section (A – Basics) a theoretical framework concept will be drawn up, out of which an evaluation grid can be derived for the subsequent analysis. Three dimensions for the shaping of an organization and three stages for organizational learning will be distinguished as the optimal structural range.
The second section (B – Hermeneutic analysis and perception) documents the hermeneutic and value-free approach to the Regula Benedicti in the sense of a historical reconstruction.
The third section which is built on to this (C – Adaptation and interpretation) deals with the critical appreciation and a current reinterpretation of the findings.
In the final capital, (D – Yield and connections) as an extension to the study, the results are summarised according to a new and special system, related to current approaches and concepts in research, as well as formulated according to corresponding research request.
In consideration of the fundamental forms of adult educational thinking and argument, the findings can be discussed within the controversial field of the dilemmas „The rationality of values and purpose“ and „Stability and flexibility“. The study demonstrates the significance of values for organizations. Values, which are portrayed in everyday culture and thereby represent essential conditions of socialisation for the members of the organization. Whereas the general opinion in the discourse about learning organization postulates eternal readiness for change, a plea for stability in the sense of organizational identity can be derived from this investigation. In an integrated understanding of organizational learning, learning will be related to the educational term and defined through it as well. This definition using educational theory supports the subject status of those in the organization who are learning.