10900/153530

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Batist, Zachary
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-17T13:57:06Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-17T12:48:04Z
dc.date.issued 2024-08-12
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10900/153530
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-94869
dc.description Korrigierte Version. Keywords geändert. de_DE
dc.description.abstract Archaeology is a complex and communal undertaking that brings together people with varied backgrounds, who mobilize a wide range of tools and expert knowledge to assemble the archaeological record. In recognizing objects of interest and characterizing their significance through encoded disciplinary language (i.e. through data construction and other forms of scholarly communication), we situate our tacit, local experiences within an archaeological epistemic culture, or common modes of reasoning. Communication among archaeologists is therefore considered as a process of enculturation, whereby a shared understanding of the pragmatic conditions and expectations that underlie a record’s construction facilitates its continued use by others. This paper presents the preliminary results from my doctoral research, which is an attempt to better understand this archaeological epistemic culture, and to develop information infrastructures that facilitate the interoperability of archaeological data across research contexts. By observing archaeologists as they work, which includes affixing GoPro action cameras to their foreheads in order to obtain first-person perspectives, the physical, cognitive and communicative processes that comprise common fieldwork practices are formally identified and related. These observations are integrated with interviews and analysis of recording practices in order to better understand individuals’ affective roles within their socio-technical research environments, as well as the communicative processes (i.e. documentation, representation and mediation) that enable research to be distributed among archaeologists and across various settings. In sum, I trace the relationships among archaeologists, their tools, the ideas they draw from, and the archaeological record itself, as knowledge is constructed under realistic and social conditions de_DE
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Tübingen University Press
dc.rights cc-by-nc-nd
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en
dc.subject.classification Archäologie de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 930 de_DE
dc.type ConferencePaper de_DE
utue.publikation.fachbereich Archäologie de_DE
utue.abstract.en Archaeology is a complex and communal undertaking that brings together people with varied backgrounds, who mobilize a wide range of tools and expert knowledge to assemble the archaeological record. In recognizing objects of interest and characterizing their significance through encoded disciplinary language (i.e. through data construction and other forms of scholarly communication), we situate our tacit, local experiences within an archaeological epistemic culture, or common modes of reasoning. Communication among archaeologists is therefore considered as a process of enculturation, whereby a shared understanding of the pragmatic conditions and expectations that underlie a record’s construction facilitates its continued use by others. This paper presents the preliminary results from my doctoral research, which is an attempt to better understand this archaeological epistemic culture, and to develop information infrastructures that facilitate the interoperability of archaeological data across research contexts. By observing archaeologists as they work, which includes affixing GoPro action cameras to their foreheads in order to obtain first-person perspectives, the physical, cognitive and communicative processes that comprise common fieldwork practices are formally identified and related. These observations are integrated with interviews and analysis of recording practices in order to better understand individuals’ affective roles within their socio-technical research environments, as well as the communicative processes (i.e. documentation, representation and mediation) that enable research to be distributed among archaeologists and across various settings. In sum, I trace the relationships among archaeologists, their tools, the ideas they draw from, and the archaeological record itself, as knowledge is constructed under realistic and social conditions.
dc.title.en Documenting archaeological knowledge construction as information practices
utue.opus.portal caa2018 de_DE
utue.publikation.source Human History and Digital Future : Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch archaeological practice en
utue.publikation.freienglisch meaning-making en
utue.publikation.freienglisch collaborative practices en

Dateien:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd