JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Holtz, Peter | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-02T06:12:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-02T06:12:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1478-0895 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10900/112278 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | de_DE |
| dc.publisher | Routledge Journals | de_DE |
| dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1447622 | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | 150 | de_DE |
| dc.title | Popper was not a Positivist: Why Critical Rationalism Could be an Epistemology for Qualitative as well as Quantitative Social Scientific Research | de_DE |
| dc.type | Article | de_DE |
| utue.quellen.id | 20200929220116_00029 | |
| utue.publikation.seiten | 541-564 | de_DE |
| utue.personen.roh | Holtz, Peter | |
| utue.personen.roh | Odag, Oezen | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.ZSTitelID | Qualitative Research in Psychology | de_DE |
| dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Issue | 4 | de_DE |
| dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Volume | 17 | de_DE |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
| Dateien | Größe | Format | Anzeige |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien. |
|||