Determinants and consequences of offloading working memory processes

DSpace Repositorium (Manakin basiert)

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.advisor Papenmeier, Frank (Dr.)
dc.contributor.author Grinschgl, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-18T10:18:11Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-18T10:18:11Z
dc.date.issued 2020-09-18
dc.identifier.other 1733317600 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10900/106961
dc.identifier.uri http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-1069618 de_DE
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-48339
dc.description.abstract In my PhD-project I investigated the externalization of working memory processes into technical tools (i.e. cognitive offloading). Thereby, two main research questions arose – first, how do individuals decide to offload working memory processes and second, what consequences does this offloading behavior have on immediate and subsequent task performance. Regarding the former, I performed two studies investigating metacognitions as determinants of cognitive offloading. To measure offloading behavior, I used and adapted the Pattern Copy Task – a free choice offloading paradigm. While I did not find a relationship between metacognitive beliefs and offloading behavior in Study 1 (N = 80), I used fake performance feedback (below-average vs. above-average vs. no feedback) to experimentally manipulate metacognitive beliefs in Study 2 (N = 159). The participants adopted their metacognitive beliefs according to the feedback, but there were no group effects on offloading behavior. I argue that rather actual working memory performance and related metacognitive experiences act as a predictor for cognitive offloading than metacognitive beliefs. Regarding the consequences of offloading behavior, in Study 3 I observed a trade-off between enhanced immediate task processing but decreased subsequent memory performance due to cognitive offloading within three experiments (each N = 172). Nonetheless, cognitive offloading was not harmful for long-term memory formation under all circumstances. If participants were forced to offload maximally but also had the intention to foster a strong long-term memory detrimental effects of offloading could be counteracted. In a last study (Study 4, N = 133) I tested whether cognitive offloading in one task is beneficial for the performance of a simultaneous secondary task. When participants offloaded more within the Pattern Copy Task due to low temporal costs associated with offloading, they showed a better secondary task performance than when they offloaded less due to high temporal costs. Cognitive offloading might therefore foster secondary task performance; however, this influence is not fully explained yet. My studies provide a systematic investigation of the omnipresent phenomena “cognitive offloading” and serve for a better understanding of humans’ technical tool use. en
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Universität Tübingen de_DE
dc.rights ubt-podno de_DE
dc.rights.uri http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.php?la=de de_DE
dc.rights.uri http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.php?la=en en
dc.subject.classification Gedächtnis , Metakognition de_DE
dc.subject.ddc 150 de_DE
dc.subject.other Cognitive offloading en
dc.subject.other memory en
dc.subject.other metacognition en
dc.subject.other human-technology interaction en
dc.title Determinants and consequences of offloading working memory processes de_DE
dc.type PhDThesis de_DE
dcterms.dateAccepted 2020-09-10
utue.publikation.fachbereich Psychologie de_DE
utue.publikation.fakultaet 7 Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät de_DE

Dateien:

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige