dc.contributor.advisor |
Papenmeier, Frank (Dr.) |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Grinschgl, Sandra |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-09-18T10:18:11Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-09-18T10:18:11Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-09-18 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
1733317600 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/106961 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-1069618 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-48339 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In my PhD-project I investigated the externalization of working memory processes into technical tools (i.e. cognitive offloading). Thereby, two main research questions arose – first, how do individuals decide to offload working memory processes and second, what consequences does this offloading behavior have on immediate and subsequent task performance. Regarding the former, I performed two studies investigating metacognitions as determinants of cognitive offloading. To measure offloading behavior, I used and adapted the Pattern Copy Task – a free choice offloading paradigm. While I did not find a relationship between metacognitive beliefs and offloading behavior in Study 1 (N = 80), I used fake performance feedback (below-average vs. above-average vs. no feedback) to experimentally manipulate metacognitive beliefs in Study 2 (N = 159). The participants adopted their metacognitive beliefs according to the feedback, but there were no group effects on offloading behavior. I argue that rather actual working memory performance and related metacognitive experiences act as a predictor for cognitive offloading than metacognitive beliefs. Regarding the consequences of offloading behavior, in Study 3 I observed a trade-off between enhanced immediate task processing but decreased subsequent memory performance due to cognitive offloading within three experiments (each N = 172). Nonetheless, cognitive offloading was not harmful for long-term memory formation under all circumstances. If participants were forced to offload maximally but also had the intention to foster a strong long-term memory detrimental effects of offloading could be counteracted. In a last study (Study 4, N = 133) I tested whether cognitive offloading in one task is beneficial for the performance of a simultaneous secondary task. When participants offloaded more within the Pattern Copy Task due to low temporal costs associated with offloading, they showed a better secondary task performance than when they offloaded less due to high temporal costs. Cognitive offloading might therefore foster secondary task performance; however, this influence is not fully explained yet. My studies provide a systematic investigation of the omnipresent phenomena “cognitive offloading” and serve for a better understanding of humans’ technical tool use. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
dc.rights |
ubt-podno |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.php?la=de |
de_DE |
dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.php?la=en |
en |
dc.subject.classification |
Gedächtnis , Metakognition |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
150 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.other |
Cognitive offloading |
en |
dc.subject.other |
memory |
en |
dc.subject.other |
metacognition |
en |
dc.subject.other |
human-technology interaction |
en |
dc.title |
Determinants and consequences of offloading working memory processes |
de_DE |
dc.type |
PhDThesis |
de_DE |
dcterms.dateAccepted |
2020-09-10 |
|
utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Psychologie |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
7 Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
de_DE |